BCG Matrix simply explained: Portfolio analysis for companies

In today’s dynamic business world, companies face the challenge of optimally allocating their limited resources and making strategic decisions that guarantee long-term success. The BCG Matrix, developed by the renowned consulting firm Boston Consulting Group, has established itself as one of the most important tools for portfolio analysis and helps managers systematically evaluate and prioritize their business units.

What is the BCG Matrix and why is it crucial?

The BCG Matrix, also called the Boston Matrix or Growth-Share Matrix, is a strategic planning tool that helps companies analyze and categorize their various business units or product lines. This method was developed in the 1970s by Bruce Henderson at the Boston Consulting Group and revolutionized the way companies evaluate their portfolios.

Important: The BCG Matrix is based on the insight that not all business units should be treated equally – some generate cash flow, others require investments for future growth.

The matrix categorizes business units into four different quadrants based on two key dimensions:

• Market growth rate (vertical): Shows the growth potential of the respective market
• Relative market share (horizontal): Measures the competitive position compared to the strongest competitor

This two-dimensional analysis enables companies to optimize their resource allocation and make informed strategic decisions.

The four core elements of the BCG Matrix

Stars – The growth champions

Stars are located in the upper left quadrant of the matrix and are characterized by a high market share in fast-growing markets. These business units are the company’s hopefuls and have the potential to become future Cash Cows.

Characteristics of Stars:

• High revenue growth rates
• Strong market position
• Require continuous investments
• Already generate positive cash flows

Strategic recommendation: Continue investing in Stars to strengthen their market position and prepare them for the transition to Cash Cows.

Cash Cows – The reliable money makers

Cash Cows occupy the lower left quadrant and represent business units with a high market share in slow-growing or mature markets. They are the financial pillars of the company and finance investments in other areas.

Characteristics of Cash Cows:

• Stable, high profit margins
• Low investment needs
• Generate surplus liquidity
• Operate in saturated markets

Strategic recommendation: Maximize cash flow generation from Cash Cows and use the funds to finance Stars and promising Question Marks.

Question Marks – The strategic turning points

Question Marks, also called Problem Children, are located in the upper right quadrant. They operate in high-growth markets but have a low market share and face the critical decision: invest or divest.

Characteristics of Question Marks:

• High capital requirements
• Uncertain future prospects
• Potential to develop into Stars
• Risk of failure

Strategic recommendation: Analyze Question Marks carefully and selectively decide which have the potential to become Stars. Invest selectively or exit.

Dogs – The resource drainers

Dogs are located in the lower right quadrant and are characterized by a low market share in slow-growing markets. They tie up valuable resources without delivering corresponding returns.

Characteristics of Dogs:

• Low profitability
• Weak competitive position
• Limited growth prospects
• Tie up unnecessary capital

Strategic recommendation: Consider divestment or repositioning of Dogs to free up resources for more promising business units.

Step-by-step guide to applying the BCG Matrix

Step 1: Define business units

Identify and clearly define distinct business units (Strategic Business Units, SBUs). Each unit should serve its own market and enable independent strategic decisions.

Criteria for defining SBUs:

• Independent target group
• Specific competitive landscape
• Separate profit and loss responsibility
• Different success factors

Step 2: Determine market growth rate

Calculate the annual growth rate of the relevant market for each business unit. Use external market research data or industry reports.

Formula for market growth rate:

Market growth rate = ((Market volume year 2 - Market volume year 1) / Market volume year 1) × 100

Tip: Use a period of 3-5 years for a meaningful average growth rate calculation.

Step 3: Determine relative market share

The relative market share is calculated by dividing your own market share by the market share of the strongest competitor.

Formula for relative market share:

Relative market share = Own market share / Market share of the strongest competitor

A value above 1.0 indicates market leadership; values below 1.0 indicate a weaker position.

Step 4: Positioning in the matrix

Plot each business unit as a circle in the matrix. The size of the circle should be proportional to the revenue or strategic importance of the unit.

Axis division:

• Y-axis (Market growth): Usually 0-20%, with 10% as the dividing line between high and low
• X-axis (Relative market share): Logarithmic scale from 0.1 to 10, with 1.0 as the dividing line

Step 5: Derive strategic conclusions

Analyze the position of each business unit and develop specific strategies based on the quadrant assignment.

Practical example: Sock subscription service portfolio

Imagine our innovative sock subscription service has developed into a diversified company with various product lines. Here is the BCG Matrix analysis:

Premium sock subscription (Star)

• Market growth: 25% annually (fast-growing subscription commerce market)
• Relative market share: 1.8 (market leader in the premium niche)
• Revenue share: 45% of total revenue

Analysis: The core of the business with high growth potential and strong position. Continuous investments in design, marketing, and customer experience are essential.

Basic sock line (Cash Cow)

• Market growth: 3% annually (mature sock market)
• Relative market share: 2.1 (strong position in offline retail)
• Revenue share: 35% of total revenue

Analysis: Stable source of income with high profit margins. Cash flows finance innovation and expansion in other areas.

Sustainable organic socks (Question Mark)

• Market growth: 30% annually (booming sustainability market)
• Relative market share: 0.4 (still weak position)
• Revenue share: 15% of total revenue

Analysis: High potential but uncertain position. Strategic decision required: massive investment or exit from the segment.

Children’s sock line (Dog)

• Market growth: 2% annually (stagnant market)
• Relative market share: 0.3 (weak competitive position)
• Revenue share: 5% of total revenue

Analysis: Ties up resources without corresponding returns. Consider divestment or radical repositioning.

Strategic portfolio recommendations

Short-term measures (0-12 months):

• Increase marketing investments for premium sock subscription by 40%
• Optimize cost structure in basic sock line
• Market test for sustainable organic socks in selected regions

Medium-term strategies (1-3 years):

• Internationalization of premium sock subscription
• Productivity increase in Cash Cow through automation
• Build strategic partnerships in the organic segment

Long-term visions (3+ years):

• Transformation into a holistic lifestyle subscription provider
• Divestment of the children’s sock line
• Position organic socks as the new Star

Common mistakes in applying the BCG Matrix

Mistake 1: Too static a view

Many companies treat the BCG Matrix as a one-time analysis tool instead of updating it regularly. Markets develop dynamically, and positions can change quickly.

Solution: Conduct portfolio reviews at least semi-annually and continuously monitor market trends.

Mistake 2: Oversimplified categorization

Reducing to four quadrants can lead to overly simplified strategic decisions. Business units near dividing lines require differentiated consideration.

Solution: Complement the BCG Matrix with additional analysis dimensions such as competitive intensity, technological developments, or regulatory risks.

Mistake 3: Neglecting interdependencies

Stars and Cash Cows are often viewed in isolation without considering synergies between different business units.

Solution: Systematically analyze interactions between portfolio areas and leverage cross-selling potentials.

Mistake 4: Short-term profit maximization

Focusing on quick results leads to underinvestment in Question Marks with long-term potential.

Solution: Develop balanced KPIs that consider both short-term profitability and long-term growth potential.

Mistake 5: Poor market definition

Markets defined too broadly or too narrowly distort the analysis and lead to wrong strategic conclusions.

Solution: Define markets based on customer needs and substitution possibilities, not just product categories.

Modern extensions of the classic BCG Matrix

Consider digital transformation

In the digital age, additional factors such as network effects, platform economies, and data advantages must be included in the analysis.

Extended evaluation criteria:

• Digital market maturity
• Scaling potential
• Customer data quality
• Degree of automation

Integrate sustainability dimension

Modern companies must include ESG criteria (Environmental, Social, Governance) in their portfolio analysis.

Sustainability factors:

• CO2 footprint of the business unit
• Social impacts
• Regulatory sustainability risks
• Stakeholder expectations

Agile portfolio methods

Instead of rigid planning cycles, agile approaches enable continuous adjustments of portfolio strategy.

Agile principles:

• Iterative portfolio reviews
• Quick pivot decisions
• Experimental approach with Question Marks
• Continuous learning and adaptation

Conclusion: The BCG Matrix as a strategic compass

Even after more than 50 years, the BCG Matrix remains an indispensable tool for strategic portfolio analyses. It provides managers with a structured framework to evaluate their business units and optimize resource allocation. Especially in economically uncertain times, it helps set priorities and make difficult decisions.

Key insights:

• Balance is crucial: A healthy portfolio needs both Cash Cows to finance and Stars for future growth
• Selective investments: Not all Question Marks deserve investment – selection must be strategic
• Dynamic view: Regular updates of the matrix are essential for relevant strategic decisions
• Contextual adaptation: The matrix should be adapted to modern business realities such as digitalization and sustainability

Successful application of the BCG Matrix requires more than just mechanically classifying business units. It demands deep market understanding, strategic thinking, and the courage to make uncomfortable decisions.

But we also know that this process can take time and effort. This is exactly where Foundor.ai comes in. Our intelligent business plan software systematically analyzes your input and transforms your initial concepts into professional business plans. You not only receive a tailor-made business plan template but also concrete, actionable strategies for maximum efficiency improvement in all areas of your company.

Start now and bring your business idea to the point faster and more precisely with our AI-powered business plan generator!